Senator COLBECK (Tasmania—Minister for Aged Care and Senior Australians and Minister for Youth and Sport) (14:33): As I indicated yesterday, all of these projects were election commitments. We made a number of election commitments for sporting projects— The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Wong, on a point of order? Senator Wong: I know that the minister is simply repeating the script that the Leader of the Government in the Senate has given him, but my point of order is on direct relevance. We did not ask about guidelines. We did not ask about election commitments. We asked about an answer that the minister gave previously in relation to advice from agencies, and I would ask you to ask him to return to that question. The PRESIDENT: The minister has been speaking for eight seconds. I appreciate it was a specific question that related to advice received or not received, and the minister needs to address that particular question. He has only been speaking for eight seconds, so I'm going to grant him a couple of sentences, at the very least, before I make a judgement on direct relevance. Senator Colbeck. Senator COLBECK: Thank you, Mr President. As I was saying, all of the projects that are being administered under this program were election promises. As I indicated to the chamber yesterday, because the delivery of these projects is very similar to the way that CDG projects are rolled out— Senator Farrell interjecting— Senator COLBECK: the department have decided—it expressed no concerns to me, Senator Farrell—to use the guidelines for the delivery of CDG projects for the delivery of this program. There was no concern from my department to me around how this program might be delivered. The government made a decision that the Department of Health would deliver this program rather than the department of infrastructure, and the Department of Health is utilising— (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Farrell, a final supplementary question?