Senator WONG (South Australia—Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) (17:25): If I understand your ruling from earlier—unless that is now being altered—it is that, as a consequence of what I might call the chapeau and paragraph (a) being voted against, paragraph (b) is no longer operative, in which case there is no further amendment to be put. We then moved to the substantive motion moved by Senator Cormann, and I understand Senator Di Natale has reserved the Greens' position to vote against the substantive motion, which has, in effect, the same political position. Am I right? The PRESIDENT: So we're now dealing with Senator Cormann's substantive motion, now that paragraph (a) has failed and the rest has been withdrawn. The question is that Senator Cormann's motion be agreed to. Question agreed to.