Senator STORER (South Australia) (09:52): I seek to insert an amendment to Senator Wong's amendment to government business notice of motion No. 1, which I believe has just been circulated in the chamber, relating to the Parliamentary Transparency Charter: After subparagraph (aa)(iii), insert: (iv) general business notice of motion no. 1446, relating to a Parliamentary Transparency Charter; The PRESIDENT: I will commence by putting Senator Storer's amendment to Senator Wong's amendment. Question agreed to. The PRESIDENT: The motion is now amended with Senator Storer's. Following the request of Senator Patrick, I will actually put paragraphs (aa)(i) and (ii); the new paragraph (aa)(iv), which is the amendment accepted that was moved by Senator Storer; and paragraph (ab) of Senator Wong's motion, because Senator Patrick has asked that paragraph (aa)(iii) be dealt with separately. Is everyone clear on what we're voting on? We're voting on everything in Senator Wong's amendment, with Senator Storer's amendment, minus (aa)(iii) of Senator Wong's amendment. Senator Cormann?