Senator BRANDIS (Queensland—Attorney-General, Vice-President of the Executive Council and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:04): The very submission which you asked me about in your primary question, Senator, about transitional arrangements shows that the Prime Minister is doing that very thing, and I read you the quote. Your claim that the cuts in penalty rates go further than beyond the retail and hospitality industries is false. It is false. That is why I said to you, Senator Cameron, in answer to your first supplementary question that this was merely another Labor Party stunt. We know that we live— The PRESIDENT: Senator Cameron, on a point of order? Senator Cameron: My point of order goes to relevance. The minister has gone nowhere near the question I asked. It was in relation to the $50 billion handout to big business and refusing to advocate for ordinary workers who rely on penalty rates. The minister should be drawn to the question. The PRESIDENT: There is no point of order. Your question was, 'Why is the Prime Minister prepared to dig in,' and the Attorney-General answered that question up-front, at the commencement of his question. He said that the Prime Minister is not doing such a thing. Senator BRANDIS: The person who is doing the wrong thing by workers, Senator Cameron, is Mr Bill Shorten and you and the Labor frontbench by causing unnecessary concern on the part of workers in other industries. The Fair Work Commission in its determination on the retail and hospitality industries made it perfectly clear—it made it explicitly clear—that it would not extend to other industries. There you go filing a gratuitous submission, misleadingly suggesting that it would. (Time expired)