Senator SESELJA (Australian Capital Territory) (15:07): I wonder what the Labor Party's values are that Senator Singh finished on there and what they meant in foreign aid, because it is interesting that Australia became, I think, the third biggest recipient of foreign aid in our region under the former, Labor government, under their shambolic policies. They so badly lost control of the borders and lost control of the budget that we became the third largest recipient of Australian aid in the region in relation to border protection policies or so-called border protection policies under the former, Labor government. That was their idea of a sustainable aid budget. I think that Senator Singh should reflect on that fact—whether that was actually a good outcome when we saw the Labor Party lose control of the budget, lose control of the borders and make Australia the third largest recipient of Australian aid. Does that fit with the Labor Party values that Senator Singh was referring to at the end of her contribution? I would say that the Labor Party values reflected in today's question time are mainly about deceit—mainly about trying to mislead the Australian people with some of their questioning. I am not surprised that Senator Cameron's question has not been taken note of, because of the embarrassment when he got the answers from the Attorney-General. I am not surprised they did not go to Senator Cameron's question. But that was along the same lines: he was asking a question and making assertions which were false, absolutely false. Let us deal with the other questions that we are taking note of today. Firstly, in terms of school funding, the coalition is delivering, in the four-year budget period, $1.2 billion more in school funding than the Labor Party were going to. That is a fact. Senator O'NEILL: That was just a shift from youth funding. Senator SESELJA: That is a fact. Senator O'Neill: That was just a shift over from youth funding. Senator SESELJA: It is $1.2 billion more than they were going to. So not only does it increase every year— Senator O'Neill: That's not true. Senator Bushby: That's true. Senator SESELJA: Not only does it increase every year— Senator O'Neill: You cut $30 billion. Senator SESELJA: Not only does it increase every year, Senator O'Neill— Senator Bushby: It's $1.2 billion more than you. Senator SESELJA: So it is going up significantly every year. We committed to that four-year funding. But the Labor Party decided, before the election, to rip out $1.2 billion and not tell anyone about it. So we have had to restore the $1.2 billion that they ripped out, whilst increasing the funding in the four-year funding period. So, that is another scare campaign that is completely false that was in this question time. We had Senator Cameron with his embarrassing effort in relation to Aboriginal legal services, which was false— Senator Lines: That is not false— Senator SESELJA: We had the issues around schools. Senator Lines: it's true. Senator SESELJA: Senator Lines interjects because— Senator LINES: Because I'm telling the truth. Senator SESELJA: She thinks that, if she squawks just that little bit louder, somehow what she says will be true. Well, it is not true. Those are the facts. Senator Lines: Nothing that you're saying is true. Senator SESELJA: Those are the facts, Senator Lines. Senator LINES: No, they're not. Senator SESELJA: You ripped out $1.2 billion. We restored it. We not only increased funding to schools every year; we restored the $1.2 billion you ripped out when you were trying to repair the debt and deficit that you left us. I would say that that is a very, very good start. Senator O'Neill interjecting— Senator SESELJA: Let's go to the issue, Senator O'Neill, of disability funding, which you also raised. I think the AEU and Senator Wright have sunk to a new low today, shamelessly creating fear over funding for disabled school students—which Senator O'Neill has taken up. So here are some facts. There is a needs-based disability loading. It was introduced by this government in 2014 as part of the new school-funding arrangements. The loading is based on the current state and territory definitions of 'disabled student', and so every student who meets this definition attracts the loading. There has been no cut to Australian government support for students with disability. In fact, there is more funding— Senator O'Neill interjecting— Senator SESELJA: for students with disability than ever before. The government is providing $5.2 billion for students with disability over the period 2014 to 2017, including over $1.2 billion for students with disability in 2015 alone. On all of these issues, the Labor Party is not telling the truth. At least Senator Cameron, in his embarrassment, managed to acknowledge that he was not telling the truth. I hope Senator O'Neill, when she gets up, will make the same recognition—that she has gotten it wrong. (Time expired)