Senator XENOPHON (South Australia) (15:29): I will make a very brief contribution. I indicate that I will be supporting the motion for the suspension of standing orders. I think the government—or governments as a general principle—ought to be able to rearrange their business. So I indicate that. Secondly, in relation to the bill in question, I think it is an important bill that is the subject of passionate debate on both sides of the fence. It is important, and I also believe it ought to be debated and dealt with one way or the other. I will support the government's motion that this bill be dealt with, but I think there ought to be some reasonableness in terms of sitting hours. That is not in the motion, but I think that can be dealt with as the debate evolves. In respect of this being seen to be a gag on any debate, I make it clear that in procedural matters I think there is a clear distinction between the two. There ought not be under any circumstances a gag in terms of the consideration of this bill in the committee stage in terms of any amendments or any consideration of this particular bill.